Either wrong or right, taking time to expose your ideas and try to raise the consciousness of the readers in this website is just a waste of time.
Posted by Guest on Wed Feb 10 00:46:41 2016
In reply to the anon directly below
What? You're saying that a pregnant person can decide what happens to their bodies /on a whim/ and be the only ones allowed to do so? Wow that sounds... entirely logical.
But yeah, I guess the fact that you can't force abortifacients on people is the 'real issue' though? Shutup you entitled creep.
P.S. Stop misusing the term murder and grow the hell up.
Presumably because they wanted to murder that baby first, and because male privilege is not allowed in their independent wombs. But their child support payment is always welcome of course.
This effective compromise between the “pro-life” and “pro-choice” positions results in a Frankenstein gestalt of legalistic white-knighting, under which the legally protected “personhood” of a certain demographic lies at the mercy of a woman’s whim. In other words, that fledgling womb growth has rights/no rights, dammit…unless m’lady says...
The legal system in place only considers it a mass of cells in a woman's body if she decides to abort it.
Presumably because they wanted to murder that baby first, and because male privilege is not allowed in their independent wombs. But their child support payment is always welcome of course.
This effective compromise between the “pro-life” and “pro-choice” positions results in a Frankenstein gestalt of legalistic white-knighting, under which the legally protected “personhood” of a certain demographic lies at the mercy of a woman’s whim. In other words, that fledgling womb growth has rights/no rights, dammit…unless m’lady says otherwise, of course! It reminds of those soldiers in the “pro-life” brigade who make an exception in their otherwise strident position for rape, placing female feelings above “the sanctity of life” and the decrees they profess to observe.
Posted by Anonymous (guest) on Sun Mar 9 19:51:51 2014
Calm down bro. Nobody's raining on your baby-killing parade.
Posted by Guest on Sun Mar 9 10:38:34 2014
Double facepalm and missed the point
I know that the "rock the baby" motion is the sign for "baby." I never said otherwise. What I said is the sign was originally one thing and the pro-life movement didn't like it and added the sign for baby to it. Every pro-choice person I know uses the other one precisely because fetus =/= baby.
Posted by Guest on Sat Mar 8 15:54:34 2014
/faceslap
You know a fetus isn't a baby. It has a lot to do with anti-abortion fucktards.
Posted by Guest on Sat Mar 8 12:17:44 2014
/facepalm
you know, the "rock the baby" movement you're talking about IS the sign for baby. it has nothing to do with pro life.
Posted by anon (guest) on Fri Mar 7 16:45:16 2014
This is why I hate deaf people
Posted by Guest on Fri Mar 7 15:39:54 2014
I didn't know the pro life folks had a sense of humor.
Posted by Guest on Fri Mar 7 15:38:31 2014
It should be something like "I don't like black babies"