Guess big budgets don't buy nearly what they used to.

Posted by Guest on Tue Jul 5 01:31:18 2011

why not? its his films, his budget. It makes sense to recycle. Picky people.

Posted by Guest on Tue Jul 5 04:22:50 2011

I think the fact that someone paid this much attention to not one, but two Michael Bay films is much more distressing.

Posted by Guest on Tue Jul 5 06:47:31 2011

The reason Bay used recycled footage is that this was the stunt the one stuntwoman got severely hurt. He didn't think it was a good idea to use that take. So they had to recycle it.

Posted by Guest on Tue Jul 5 07:04:27 2011

recycling

Michael Bay recycling...again,Transformers 1 had pearl harbor footage.

Posted by Guest (guest) on Tue Jul 5 10:42:00 2011

Shit like this gets done all the time in CGI, re-filming a car crash like this either as CGI or traditionally is expensive as shit on top of a shitty CGI loaded film. They've done this with movies for an eternity now in Hollywood. Regardless though, the Mantra in CGI is "if you can tell its CGI, then its bad CGI."

Posted by Guest on Tue Jul 5 18:14:06 2011

It's cheap is why. People aren't paying outrageous prices for tickets to see literally the same scenes in different movies. So what if they added in a giant fucking robot.

It's bullshit.

Posted by Guest on Wed Jul 6 00:10:43 2011

If Michael Bay had any fans they would be outraged.

Posted by Guest on Wed Jul 6 02:40:19 2011

"It's bullshit."

It's bullshit that you and 99.999999% of people would never have noticed if it wasn't for someone pointing it out to them.

Posted by Guest on Wed Jul 6 17:53:02 2011

This is why I miss real films. Movies with plot and true vision. Not some summer blockbuster CGI dollar machine. I miss real fake blood, stunts, real weapons with blanks, and props. Not computer crap like everyone uses today.

Posted by Guest on Wed Jul 6 19:20:09 2011

For all you tards who are shouting about this making the film crap and shit. This scene was used because the stunt person used for the original shoot was paralysed, so this was used out of respect as it fitted nicely and obviously didn't show a woman being seriously injured irl.

Posted by Guest on Thu Jul 7 14:59:10 2011

This is why I miss real films. Movies with plot and true vision. Not some summer blockbuster CGI dollar machine. I miss real fake blood, stunts, real weapons with blanks, and props. Not computer crap like everyone uses today.

I was waiting for the dipshit boohoo CGI makes everything worse crowd. Plot and True vision? That's the fucking studio/director's problem. Remember all the Fireworks and Fake Blood shitty awful blockbusters they used to make before CGI? Yeah, Michael Bay would fucking suck no matter what decade hes in, even if it were the 1930s.

Remember that scene where the deer gets shot in No Country for Old Men? Every single piece of that shot is CGI 3D models including all the deer and the ground.

Good CGI is the CGI you never notice.

Posted by Guest on Thu Jul 7 19:06:43 2011

"While riding in a 2006 Toyota during a stunt, she was hit by an object that smashed through the windshield. She was rushed to a local Chicago-area hospital after the incident and further details were not released regarding her condition. Cedillo is not an official member of the stunt crew and is a movie extra. "The vehicle was being towed by another vehicle," movie extra Blaine Baker told Chicago station WLS, according to Radar. “The cable between the two vehicles broke. It whipped around and sliced through the woman's car and sliced through her skull, apparently.”

Posted by Gallery Administrator on Sat Jul 9 19:02:20 2011

knew this would bring all the wiggers out of the woodwork...

used to be that a George Miller film wasn't released until at least one stunt man died. It was an offering to the gods of the action film.

go suck Shia LaBeouf's dick u morons

Posted by wkw (guest) on Sat Jul 9 20:01:09 2011

Actually this is not the gif of that, here is the video of the extra being injured.

Posted by Guest on Mon Jul 11 05:25:05 2011