It's not a double negative because he's saying 'Look at all the fucks I don't give.' Not 'Look at the absence of fucks I don't give.' Or 'I don't give a fuck about all these fucks I'm not giving, do you see?' What he's saying is 'Look at all (over there...
It's not a double negative because he's saying 'Look at all the fucks I don't give.' Not 'Look at the absence of fucks I don't give.' Or 'I don't give a fuck about all these fucks I'm not giving, do you see?' What he's saying is 'Look at all (over there where there is an unknown quantity of fucks)the fucks I'm not giving.' In so doing setting up for us a quantum superposition of states in which he is not giving a lot of fucks or not giving a fuck as expressed by a negative quantity of fuck.
Posted by mrkungmcbung (guest) on Mon Jan 21 15:45:07 2013
double negative?
So there are no fucks that you DON'T give? I guess that means that you do give fucks.
Recent comments
(view all 5 comments)It's not a double negative because he's saying 'Look at all the fucks I don't give.' Not 'Look at the absence of fucks I don't give.' Or 'I don't give a fuck about all these fucks I'm not giving, do you see?' What he's saying is 'Look at all (over there...
It's not a double negative because he's saying 'Look at all the fucks I don't give.' Not 'Look at the absence of fucks I don't give.' Or 'I don't give a fuck about all these fucks I'm not giving, do you see?' What he's saying is 'Look at all (over there where there is an unknown quantity of fucks)the fucks I'm not giving.' In so doing setting up for us a quantum superposition of states in which he is not giving a lot of fucks or not giving a fuck as expressed by a negative quantity of fuck.
Posted by mrkungmcbung (guest) on Mon Jan 21 15:45:07 2013
double negative?
So there are no fucks that you DON'T give? I guess that means that you do give fucks.
Posted by Guest on Mon Jan 21 05:40:23 2013