|
View CommentsOnly in baseball is that considered a surprisingly good catch. Watch some cricket and you will see the same sort of shit, but without gloves. Posted by Guest on Sun Mar 8 16:10:06 2015
Yeah, sure. Cricket is much more exciting and interesting and golly no wonder everyone plays it. Which ESPN is that on, again? Eighteen? Oh look it has eleven different names for the way the ball comes off the bat. You play with partners and trade places and wear the same enormous leg pads we do but don't have gloves. Good shit. Posted by Guest on Mon Mar 9 20:15:09 2015
Moan about cricket all you want, but cricket is much more popular than baseball. Viewership is in the billions. Posted by Guest on Tue Mar 10 00:40:21 2015
I didn't claim that cricket is superior to baseball - even though it certainly is - I just said that the catches in baseball are nuch simpler thanks to those gloves. Cricket has the same catches made with bare hands and hence is more demanding. Posted by Guest on Thu Mar 12 18:18:03 2015 Meh
American Football is merely Rugby ... with padding so the little darling's don't hurt their little heads. Posted by me (guest) on Fri Mar 13 18:52:27 2015
Comments about Baseball and American Football are true. Posted by Guest on Fri Apr 24 13:21:15 2015 |
I love the batter's disbelief at what he just saw.
"Did you catch that?!"
Posted by Guest on Sun Mar 8 01:57:56 2015