I still think he was justified in sending the dog. Firstly, in the mayhem he probably didn't see the gun being dropped. Secondly, he doesn't know if this guy is acting alone.
Lastly, fuck...
After three shakes if you watch carefully.
I still think he was justified in sending the dog. Firstly, in the mayhem he probably didn't see the gun being dropped. Secondly, he doesn't know if this guy is acting alone.
Lastly, fuck that guy.
Posted by Dom (guest) on Wed May 15 10:30:16 2013
At no point was he disarmed, the clerk was justified in lifting the dog over the counter.
Recent comments
He was disarmed
| show fullshow summaryAfter three shakes if you watch carefully.
I still think he was justified in sending the dog. Firstly, in the mayhem he probably didn't see the gun being dropped. Secondly, he doesn't know if this guy is acting alone.
Lastly, fuck...
After three shakes if you watch carefully.
I still think he was justified in sending the dog. Firstly, in the mayhem he probably didn't see the gun being dropped. Secondly, he doesn't know if this guy is acting alone.
Lastly, fuck that guy.
Posted by Dom (guest) on Wed May 15 10:30:16 2013
At no point was he disarmed, the clerk was justified in lifting the dog over the counter.
Posted by Guest on Thu May 2 02:10:14 2013
Here's the problem with this.
Depending on the state, and whither or not that robber ends up deceased.
This poor/dumb bastard will and could get charged for homicide.
The dog disarmed him the first time.
Here's the problem with this.
Depending on the state, and whither or not that robber ends up deceased.
This poor/dumb bastard will and could get charged for homicide.
The dog disarmed him the first time.
Lifting it up over the counter was unnecessary.
And yes. There are some states that would gladly convict this clerk.
Posted by Guest on Tue Apr 30 02:34:43 2013